AKOZ's Friends

View All

AKOZs page

Gifts Received

AKOZ has not received any gifts yet

Give AKOZ a Gift

Latest Activity

AKOZ left a comment for Nat

November 25, 2009

Trevor HM Cooper left a comment for AKOZ

November 11, 2009

Profile Information

City

spaceville

Country

USA

Comment Wall (12 comments)

You need to be a member of International Association of Space Entrepreneurs to add comments!

Join International Association of Space Entrepreneurs

At 11:45am on November 11, 2009, Trevor HM Cooper said…: I hear, we should leave this nest we call Earth, evolve past this Van Allan Belt.
Tasha9503 is tomorrow, designed with 1995 technology.
As this moon race continues I would like to ask every one to help us build these transport vehicles to take several crews to the Moon, Mars, beyond and back.
I will not suggest any human leave the protection of this infrastructure after passing the Van Allan Belt, but you can enter any orbit around our sun.
It is a new rocket design that produces little space junk.
Use the six robotic arms to collect space junk in preparation for mining the Asteroid Belt.
Tasha9503 will be owned buy the people, initially used as HotelsInSpace, resorts.
People in China, Brazil, Argentina, Etc. Congo, Guinea, Namibia, etc. Sahara, Tunisia, USA, Antarctica, Canada, etc. will soon be able to own the infrastructure in orbit.
The day we collect rent we will no longer be for sale.
In 1988 we started looking for all the reasons we can not move to space.
7 years we collected the sciences that say we can.
This infrastructure includes five levels of artificial gravity to remove the physical degeneration that prolonged exposure to zero-g brings.
It is a place for our children to live if an asteroid or a commit etc, hits earth or global warming makes Earth uninhabitable by humans.
Launch costs, oxygen and water purification, food and sewage, Maintenance, Reproduction.
We found the solutions to all the stoppers and slow me downs and lowered the cost.
We still ask the world why they think we can not build these HotelsInSpace if funds were available?
If we can pass the Van Allan Belt, we can pass the Moon, Mars and beyond.
Each HotelsInSpace includes 12 staff units, 72 units with sleeping for three for rent, six cafeterias, six separate zero gravity sections, gardens to feed 36 people, internet connection to the world and access to the entire HotelsInSpace.
This is the place where many people can try ZeroGravitySex.
Depending on other’s transportation facilities, we feel any time under one week per year will not be usable, unused time accumulates.
Owning one week in one hotel unit means when we have 52 hotels you own 52 weeks.
In 2009 we showed the world our answers to why we can go.
Re design the HLV.
Lift 1,000,000 lbs of pre shaped HLV.
Re use the casings fuel tanks and software in orbit as infrastructure.
Lift six satellite payloads per launch, sharing the launch cost.
Land a 400,000 lbs 200 passenger CRV, sharing the cost.
Attach 6 used rockets, clean, renovate and place the 36 satellites in their respective orbits.
Do it again, lifting another 1200 people, 36 satellites and building more HotelsInSpace.
Like LEGO, these pieces of Infrastructure can be attached end to end producing CitySkapes above the clouds.
Get on board? Do you want to build a 400,000 lbs 400 passenger landing vehicle? We will use our HLV to lift it.
APlaceInSpaceToPlay

Safety?
How many people died this month in car accidents?
How many died when swimming?
How many died in Boating accidents?
With 120 NASA shuttle launches, less than five burned on re-entry.
Less then 35 people die and less than 819 live to tell stories about space travel.
With 120 tasha9503 launches, if 4 burn on re-entry, that’s 800 people die and 23200 live to tell space stories.
We also end up with 19 HotelsInSpace.
Does that answer any questions about safety and do you have any other questions?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivHAO96FIiw

At 3:47pm on August 5, 2008, Martin Schwab said…: You might pass along these two sites on SSP to your friends, though Josh said that you have pretty much done your research. Good luck! Martin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiU9MibyBJ0

http://space.alglobus.net/papers/spaceProgram2008.html

At 10:09am on August 5, 2008, Martin Schwab said…: I should add that Ike's UN nuke bank idea (as I recall from when I worked at the Eisenhower Institute in 2003) was to only use nuclear material for peaceful purposes like for energy. You might Google "Atoms for Peace Eisenhower" to make sure I'm right before using it in a debate.

Also, it's George P. Shultz, not Schultz, Reagan's Secretary of State.

At 9:57am on August 5, 2008, Lisa said…: Battling is my forte! I shall look forward to it. :)

At 8:01am on August 5, 2008, Lisa said…: Well, thank you. I would hope my husband would agree. :)

At 7:32am on August 5, 2008, Martin Schwab said…: Got it. Good question. I agree that my opening statement in that chapter was a bit of an overstretch. Hope this clears things up: Essentially, for a while I have worried about what's going on right now between Iran and Israel on the nuclear issue which I see as a double standard which leads to nuclear proliferation. With more nuclear proliferation there are complicated scenarios I’ve seen where multiple exchanges among different adversaries all at once could shut down photosynthesis. What I’m really saying in that chapter is that no one should have nukes, which is becoming more of an accepted idea, at least by senior people who fought the Cold War. See George P. Schultz, William J. Perry, Henry A. Kissinger and Sam Nunn, “A World Free of Nuclear Weapons,” The Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2007. This idea really goes back to President Eisenhower's Atoms for Peace speech at the UN in 1953. Ike proposed that the U.S. and the Soviets place their nuke material in a UN nuke bank and my understanding is that the Soviets declined and so we had the Cold War but we didn’t have to have and we don’t have to have this Israel and Iran mess, which is pegged to the Palestinian issue.

At 6:30am on August 5, 2008, Martin Schwab said…: You sound very well read! While I happen to agree with Mearsheimer on Israel, it's not because I am a realist. I am a constructivist in the tradition of Mearsheimer's former colleague at the University of Chicago, Alexander Wendt, now at Ohio State. I encourage you to check out his work if you have not already done so.